The political origin of climagenda
My presentation in Tom Nelson's Podcast
Yesterday, Tom Nelson’s Podcast posted my presentation titled “The political origin of the climate change agenda”, which I had prepared six years ago, amid the COVID19 pandemic.1 There I did not present my main research on climate, the findings of which challenge so-called “climate science” (in reality, climate sophistry) in its entirety. These can be found elsewhere, while a summary of these findings can be found in the form of a decalogue in my following earlier post:
In addition to my primary research on climate, I also explore in parallel another path. This parallel research is historical, aiming to reveal why and how the climagenda was established, and what its true objectives are. My latest presentation falls within this parallel branch of my research. It is linked below in three forms: video, slides, and slides with script —roughly as heard in the video.
As an introduction to the presentation, here are some notes. Obviously, I am under no illusion that my findings in both my main and parallel research would be accepted either by the entire scientific community or the general public. On the contrary:
The findings of my primary (scientific) research are treated as false on the grounds that they contradict mainstream science. And it doesn’t matter that no one has found any errors in my work.
The findings of my parallel (historical) research are dismissed as conspiracy theories. And it doesn’t matter that, for everything I have written, I provide complete evidence from original sources —evidence that fully substantiates my claims.
I am fully aware of the difficulties, but I am not deterred. Nor do the labels of “denier”2 or “conspiracy theorist” that I have “earned” bother me.
My motivation behind my decision not to limit myself to primary scientific research on climate but to also conduct parallel research was initially this: I wanted to explain the reasons behind the censorship and silencing attempts, both of my own work and that of other researchers, as well as the difficulties I faced in publishing my research.3
The results of this parallel research were extremely useful to me:
I found the answers to the questions that prompted me to embark on this parallel research.
I gained a better understanding of the world we live in by exploring the connections and synergies with parallel agendas promoted by controligarchs (e.g., mass migration, supposedly climate-related, anti-meritocracy, LGBTQ-type movements, bioweapons).
Most importantly, they reinforced my confidence in my scientific findings on climate, as well as my determination to continue this scientific research. The mechanism behind this reinforcement was simple: I realized that, despite their complexity, climate models are based on shallow science, deliberately distorted to project a bleak future and serve the climagenda. Once one realizes that this is shallow and distorted science, it becomes much easier to refute it.
But I believe the findings of my parallel research could be very useful to everyone:
Those who collect money—from the funds they lavish on those who promote the climagenda (whether scientists or communications experts/journalists)—to deceive society (whether knowingly or unwittingly): It’s good for them to know that they can’t fool everyone. Some people are suspicious and know what’s going on, so they don’t grant absolution to anyone, including the unwitting. They too should have been suspicious. When someone gives you money freely, he must have an agenda—and this won’t be the planet salvation.
People in positions of responsibility who use the “climate crisis” as a scapegoat4 to escape their responsibilities: It’s good for them to know that others realize they are lying and that, according to Sophocles, «οὐδὲν ἕρπει ψεῦδος εἰς γῆρας χρόνου» (“no lie endures to become old”).5 Or, as the saying goes, «το ψέμα έχει κοντά ποδάρια» (“the lie has short legs”).
Various self-proclaimed leftists who believe that the climagenda will bring down capitalism or lead to a fair redistribution of income: They should be aware that they are serving the controligarchs and the Epsteinistan. If they believe that figures such as the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, Al Gore, Bill Gates, George Soros, the descendants of Henry Kissinger and Klaus Schwab, and the other angelic forces of Epsteinistan will bring down capitalism, I would suggest they think it again. And even if they make a living off the funds that these angelic forces generously hand out left and right, they could consider that there are other professions that don’t require them to sell their soul to the devil.
[UPDATE 2026-04-15]
Various non-leftists who believe that the controligarchs are Marxist: If they really believe that the Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, and the other angelic forces mentioned above, as welll the NGOs fed by their money, are Marxist, again I would suggest they think it again.The general public: It is good to have the opportunity to find alternative sources of information—ones that provide relevant documentation—so that everyone can search more thoroughly and form an informed opinion. Of course, this is difficult. How can alternative information reach the general public when the mainstream media will sabotage it? How can anyone, without money, take on a propaganda machine that is organized into a global network, all-powerful, and financially robust? But despite the difficulties, I think it’s worth the effort.
See also my earlier (2019) presentation and the links in the newspaper Repubblica: D. Koutsoyiannis, Personal knowable moments (DK-moments) for high-order characterization of coincidence in totalitarianism, Self-organized lecture, doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.23117.38885/1, Bologna, Italy, 17 December 2019.
See my earlier (2008) presentation: D. Koutsoyiannis, Climate change as a scapegoat in water science, technology and management, EUREAU Workshop on Climate Changes Impact on Water Resources with Emphasis on Potable Water, Chania, doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.35519.71843, European Association of Water and Wastewater Services, Hellenic Union of Water and Wastewater Enterprises, 2008.
I received the below from a German academic as part fo mty scientofic reserach. It was why hewas involved in exposing the climate fraud, beacuse he was conerned that the fake science of claimte alarm was being used to reverse the progress of the hard won German industrial economy that had been built up in his lifetime, as am I in the UK.
I know about Rockefeller , Strong and the UN Global Marxist angles, pushed out of Canada using Rockefeller cash and Candian NGOs, as documnetd by Elains Dewar in "cloak of Green" only availble on the wayback mchine now. But this post WW2 elite planning was a step further into the darkness. If JK Galbraith said it happened, I believe it happened. And is still happening, and the UN and other UN elected globalist policy makers like the IMF, WEF, etc. are still calling the shots with weak sovereign governemnts, whose elites are all in the globalist trough. No wionder they hate Trump, who is his own man, whatever problems that may bring with it. Most of his instincts seem good to me, abeit parochial through ignorance. He doesn't know NATO is defence pact? Nota war making pact. Really? Why aren't his Arab favourites paying for this war, and putting Arab boots on the ground across the Gulf?
Anyway, when you know where it all this originates, the channels of funding and NGOs it uses, and the ways in which globlaist goverbing elites are made part of it, tne Epstinean elites who act outside the law and anyidea of loyalty to their country, it makes much more sense, not less. Just follow the power and money.
Best, Brian
=================The "Report from Iron Mountain"===========
In the 1960s, when the establishment of a world government (led by the international financial elite), which was primarily intended to protect the properties of the elites internationally from nationalization, was already being looked at, the question of the governability of the population in the absence of war arose, war that would no longer take place under a world government.
Robert McNamara, then Secretary of Defense of the United States, therefore gave the “Hudson Institute for Future Research” with the well-known director Herrmann Kahn, the task of providing expertise on this question. The result of the analysis was recorded in the well-known "Report from Iron Mountain".
When the text of the report became known later, the US government declared the report satire. The well-known economist John Kenneth Galbraith, however, confirmed the authenticity of the text as a result of the commissioned analysis and his participation in the analysis.
The introduction to the text insists that rulers in history have never lasted long if they failed to engage their populations in wars. The war as the central instrument of domination with which the populations are frightened and made ready to be victims cannot be underestimated.
The report, which examines the means to control populations, comes to three key conclusions:
1) Wars are indispensable, even with a world government, to control the population.
2) It is necessary to take away from the population at least 50% of the value they create for themselves.
Otherwise there will be a rapid growth in prosperity, which would give the population the time to question the conditions of rule. Examples of inevitably fast prosperity growth under conditions in which taxes were used to build infrastructure and are not simply taken away from the population are the "economic miracle" in Germany (to be supplemented today by the cases of Japan, South Korea, or China). Persistent poverty of the population guarantees the obedience of the population.
3) The fear of the population (and the associated obedience and willingness to make sacrifices) of fictitious dangers that were invented, but could not be verified by the population, was considered promising. "Environmental problems" are mentioned as an example, which could be plausible for the population, since air and water pollution are visible. It was also noted that “environmental disasters” can also be engineered.
The reintroduction of slavery is discussed in detail. This third option was initially not considered effective by the rulers. Only after the text "The Limits to Growth" showed considerable popularity was the "Club of Rome" of the authors founded at a weekend meeting on Rockefeller's property in Italy, funded by Rockefeller. Since then, the instrument of frightening and impoverishing the population by means of non-existent "global dangers" has been used continuous (climate crisis, threats to biodiversity, plastic waste in the oceans, the alleged corona pandemic, etc.).
(In the special case of Germany, the Morgenthau Plan (deindustrialization) and the Hooton Plan (forced immigration of people from "unproductive cultures") are also carried out to destroy the productivity of society.).
Translated and edited for clarity by Brian RL Catt 2024.
I read Rockefeller Controlling the Game when it first came out, excellent book. I'm afraid most people just aren't capable of seeing through the programming they have received all their lives. You have to unlearn most of what you know to be true before you can even think of looking at things with an open mind.